Showing posts with label green hell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label green hell. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Hybrids have worse fuel economy than many other cars on the road



A Honda customer is taking the road less traveled to sue the Japanese auto maker for allegedly making false mileage claims about her 2006 Civic Hybrid.

Heather Peters is set to appear in court Jan. 3rd,  2012 in Torrance, Calif., the home of American Honda Motor, to argue that her vehicle never delivered the 50 mpg touted by the auto maker in a sales brochure.

Peters said that her car never delivered "more than 41 or 42 mpg on its very best day," adding that the mileage normally came in around the high 30s.

All of this for a car with a $7,000 premium in its price tag and a $7,500 greenie weenie rebate paid for by you and I the taxpayer. Total cost of this vehicle today without rebate?

$26,000.

A bit pricey for a weed- whacker you say? The contention of the green goblins was that you would "make up the difference" in the overpriced, over-subsidized, uncomfortable, unsafe vehicles by recouping money on fuel. Of course - the economics of that fall apart when fuel is less than $3.50 per gallon.

Let's read some more of what Ms. Peters has to say about her hybrid. She said she became really "ticked off" last year when Honda performed a software update to prevent vehicle batteries from deteriorating too quickly. The car's mileage suffered as a result of the battery fix, Peters said, dropping to the high 20s per gallon, which eventually forced her to take legal matters into her own hands.

Peters, a former corporate defense attorney, is urging other disgruntled Honda customers to opt out of a class action lawsuit over the mileage claims, and seek a larger payout in small claims court.

She launched a website "Don'tSettleWithHonda.org" with the intention of taking her legal fight viral.

Peters said claimants could be awarded up to $10,000 in small claims court, as opposed to the $200 in cash and a rebate of $500 to $1,000 toward a new Honda vehicle that will be awarded in the class action settlement.

"Class actions are great for little cases, but not for cases like this where Honda's false advertising is costing already cash-strapped families more every day at the gas pump," Peters said.

Peters estimates that if other customers follow her lead, the automaker could be forced to pay $2 billion for its questionable fuel-efficiency claims - all of which were backed, endorsed and certified by (wait for it!) - the government agency responsible for all false claims of greenness - the EPA!

So let's take the high road and give the Hybrid Civic a 34 MPG COMBINED city/highway rate since she mentions both high 20's and low 30's - we'll split the difference. We'll analyze what the difference is between a wind-up mobile and a real car if you are thinking with your head, and not with your tiny greenie weenie. Surely no non-hybrid car could approach the EPA ratings of these expensive, uncomfortable, poor performing and dangerous little cars? Let's take a look:

Jetta TDI Diesel

  • Diesel engines get better mpg generally speaking, but they are still a tough sell in North America. The 1970s brought several underpowered, smelly, smoke-belching diesels to American shores, and the buying public hasn't forgotten them. It's too bad, because clean diesel technology powers the sleek Jetta to a muscular 41 mpg on the highway with a very respectable 34 mpg for combined highway and city driving.

Wow - the Jetta is at least as good as the pie-brid.

Mini Cooper

  • The Cooper delivers good fuel efficiency, along with a cool factor, though the luster has worn off a bit since its release. Very good highway numbers (37 mpg) bring the Mini's combined mpg to a robust 32.

Wow - I can look cool, and get the same mileage as the pie-brid?

Chevy Cobalt

  • A surprise for Americans is that they have such a versatile gas-sipper in their own backyard. The Cobalt uses a large overdrive gear and direct injection to achieve 37 mpg on the highway, which more than offsets its middling 25 in the city for a great 32 mpg average.

            American made? And still as efficient as a hybrid? For $10,000 less????

Ford Focus

  • Another American-born entry quietly delivers solid numbers by virtue of its gaudy 34 on the highway. The low city number of 24 prevents this from being a standout pick, but 29 mpg combined makes it worth consideration.

Wow - 10% more gas than the hybrid - over the course of a year it will cost me an extra $100 bucks or so to have a cool car with comfort and power - not to mention the $10,000 savings?





Nissan Versa

  • There's not a "2" in sight on this miser's stat sheet. A superior 30 in the city (that's just three less than the tiny Dumb for Fortwo) yields a combined 32 mpg. City dwellers often suffer in the mpg category, but the Versa spreads the wealth for outstanding surface street driving and an adequate highway number of 34 mpg.

Larger trunk space, better handling, no batteries, seats 4 comfortably, priced some $15,000 cheaper than the hybrid Civic and has BETTER mileage? Given this range of choices, calling your vehicle a "Smart Car" can't make up for the fact you are a dumb consumer. Hang your heads in shame.

Next on Ketchup Chips - the Great Battery Bailout, or when the value of used hybrids falls to zero in the next two years.












Friday, December 30, 2011

Monday, December 12, 2011

The Flaming Volts - Not a Punk Band

The NHTSA sat on the news of the Volt fires for six months.


Why? I dunno, let me think of a few reasons for a gov't to put it's people in danger while promoting a green (Solyndra!) agenda:



  • The federal government still owns about a third of GM.
  • The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is part of the federal government.
  • GM and the federal government have invested billions of dollars in the Volt.
  • The federal government further underwrites each Volt by giving purchasers a $7,500 tax credit.
  • The federal government is the single largest customer of the Volt.

 When apprised of these issues - the writers at the Detroit Free Press said that these types of comments are the results of "entrenched Republicans" or "global warming deniers".

You have to be a gullible in-the-tank-for-Obama editorial writer for the Detroit Free Press not to have suspicions about the why's and whyfor's of these investments. One writer compared the "investment" in green technology to NASA. "Where would we be without the often battered investment we made in NASA?" he asks poignantly, just as the gov't abandons NASA for the efficiency of private, for profit enterprise, blithely ignoring the fact that the gov't "investment" in NASA in the late 50's was PURELY MILITARY, DEFENSIVE and STRATEGIC.



I guess when you are green, you pretty well remove yourself from reality.


Unless of course, you are on fire. 







Monday, August 29, 2011

Mike McGinn - Our green friend in Seattle, spends $65M to insulate 3 homes....

Mmmmm. Your tax dollars give me a righteous buzz....
Who's a hairy bear? Can I get an "oh yeah?"




These Green Jobs Fools like Mike McGinn (Chief Fool of Seattle) have got it made in the shade. Why not take the regular folks money, throw it a "Green Jobs" toilet and then cash in on the La La land vote parade of green weenies. Sorry if I am sounding a bit harsh, and I regret calling McGinn a green fool. That would be disrespectful to both fools, and the color green. Sorry Kermit.

Let's check this guy out. Environmental activist, chairman of the Sierra Club (business bad, beavers good) who got elected on the promise of "kick starting" the economy with hip, green jobs, "sustainable" development and pony rides for everyone.  Let's see how he's done shall we?

Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeee's Greenie:

  • McGinn and the rest of his friends first made sure that "Big Box" stores couldn't get into the city of Seattle, costing several thousand jobs. Attaboy Mike!
  • Created a special tax for businesses that had employees who travelled to work alone. Several hundred more jobs gone. I can now commute nowhere with nobody, because we all lost our jobs. At least we can catch the View!
  • Removed the ability of local neighborhood parents to have a say in their children's education by creating a School Board run by professional teachers, (and dissolving local PTAs) What do parents know about teaching anyways, they just clog up the system with their "ideas"....
  • Encouraged the police force of Seattle to not enforce marijuana laws (possession, use, manufacture or distribution). I was going to type out the sound of a righteous hard pull on a thick spliff, but I don't know if it is "tooootootoot" or more like "wheeeeze -  ahhhhhhhh"?
  • Was then featured on the cover of "Dope" magazine. I think that is a noun. Or is it an adjective?
  • He and his advisors actually advocate (this is a quote - Im not making this up!!!!!!!) taking auto drivers who accidentally kill or injure cyclists and "hang them by their toenails at the edge of town until buzzards peck their eyes out." . Gee guys, talk about harshing our mellow...
  • McGimp has called for homeless people to be given free housing that the taxpayer pays for on free city land. Hey if it's free, like those samples at Costco - count me in!
  • Advocates that the city should be mandated to pay for Transgender surgeries. In related news, the nearby city of Tacoma says that they will pay for surgery to turn you into robot that shoots lasers. I'm off to Tacoma so I can defeat drag queens with my laser beam of death!
Now this genius has had to come forth on his job record. Letting the people know what their hip, sustainable future is bringing them in terms of jobs and prosperity and wealth and security.  Let me get the number right for you. I'm punching it into the Cray 7000 right now - and the answer is:

ZERO. No jobs created. None. Nada. Since taking office Seattle's growth has been exactly - zero.

Despite $20 million pissed away on a home weatherstipping program for Seattle that created 14 jobs. All of them clerical and office staff, he says that if we were just patient we would see the light. By the way - McGinn made the contractors pay the workers $21 per hour to participate in the program, when the going wage was $12 for the same kind of work. He was creating "new economy jobs" ( you know the kind that look good on paper, but don't actually exist past election day.) Dozens of businesses lost their workers and failed. Hundreds more jobs lost. Go Mikey Go!

So 14 jobs created. That sucks, but how many houses did they upgrade?

3

If it wasn't so tragic it would be funny. Who are the fools here? We can point at the electorate of Seattle and laugh, but it wouldn't do much good. Toledo, Kansas City and PHOENIX spent $65 million under the same laughable federal program and created 72 jobs in total. Since this program works so well, Obama has put ANOTHER $5 BILLION into it. Dat stimbulus done be da shit.

You want comedic fodder? Go look in the mirror. That's who is being laughed at. Who is the fool now?

As G. Gordon Liddy famously said after the re-election of Clinton - "you people deserve yourselves. You sicken me - and I'm not going to hang around just to prove me right."

Talk about harshing the mellow - Hey G. Gordon - would transgender surgery make you feel any better? I mean it's free and all.........




Tuesday, August 16, 2011

LEAF + Green agenda = massive fail

All we hear about is how Detroit was left failing because they didn't offer fuel efficient cars and how they misjudged the wants and desires of the consumer. We've heard how people would eat up a new fuel efficient car, and that $4.00 per gallon gas was going to ensure that we all embraced mother earth by switching to tiny wind up cars.

The gov't was so sure that these cars were going to be a hit that they strong-armed GM (who they own!) into producing the Volt. They give generous subsidies to purchasers of these vehicles (courtesy you and me of course) - some subsidies amount to $12,000 per vehicle. They hype the fact that we should be green and concious and sustainable and on and on. Even Leo De Caprio drives a Pious. they even give them special roads to travel on!

So the times must be a changing right? Let's look at the figures.

Of the top 10 best selling vehicles in North America, 4 are full size SUVs or trucks, and only 2 can be called fuel efficient. The Leaf and the Volt combined have sold less than 2,000 units per year. The mighty Ford F-150 has sold over 600,000 units in the same time frame. The Smart Car sells about sells about 600 cars per month. Literally, the Ford F-150 does that before lunch time - every day. ( I don't know what is Smart about a car that is dangerous and uncomfortable, but then, I'm not hip.)

So what does the gov't do to force unwanted vehicles on us in order to satisfy their green agenda? They raise the efficiency requirements for vehicles, putting burdensome extra costs on the vehicles you and I want and can afford, and increase the subsidies on the vehicles that the greenie weenies want to buy. Talk about redistribution of wealth!

Even the current Smart Car (for dummies) would not meet the proposed 2015 EPA standards.

We are going to be told what to drive, where to drive, where to live and what to buy courtesy of the gov't. It is going to affect your standard of living, your personal wealth and could even take your life, and it all starts with keeping quiet when you should be shouting out.

The green agenda is based on dilution. When they make a mistake, their answer is to make many more mistakes so the effect of the prior ones is diluted. Population explosion? We were just kidding, look at air pollution? Don't buy that? How about global warming? That didn't pan out? How about global cooling? Climate change? For god's sake will anyone buy what we're selling?

Unless it is a Ford F-150, I ain't buyin' it.