Showing posts with label tea party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tea party. Show all posts

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Free Trade Makes the USA (and everyone else!) Richer!




As a friend of mine is apt to quote from South Park "They took our Jerrrbbbbbs!!" My missive below is a cautionary note to those of us (like me) that are patriotic to a fault. The anti-free trade movement is the one shit-pile where the "Occupy Whatever" movement and the Tea Party seem to exist happily together. And that should alarm and frighten you. Whatever the Occupy Whatever movement is in favor of is bad for poor people, bad for business, bad for consumers, and bad for the USA. Hell, it's bad for everybody.

A degree in economics is like a ticket to the show. I can't act, but I can attend the premiere. Here goes:

The pricing mechanism is an important part of trade. It provides a signal to producers about what to produce. In the pursuit of profits, it provides an incentive to enter markets where they can make the most, and in order to maximize those profits, strive for efficiency and innovation. The Anti-Free Trade Movement does not seem to care much for efficiency. They think efficiency causes poverty. This is unfortunate, and dead wrong.

The constant desire by producers – in a free trade environment – to win customers, encourages them to invest in new machinery and increase productivity. By increasing productivity and efficiency, prices are cut. As a result, consumers – including those in the poorest countries – are made better off. Moreover, increased efficiency enables wages to rise.

The result is that during the 1990s, 81% of American companies’ foreign investment went to Western Europe, Japan and Canada. These countries have high wages, but because their workforces are highly productive, they win hands down over workers from sub-Saharan Africa. This contradicts all the claims being made by anti-capitalist campaigners about how Western firms only want to invest where they can pay ‘sweatshop’ wages. 

Africa’s share of world trade halved between 1980 and 2000. Despite having 10% of the world’s population, it now only accounts for 1% of world trade. This shows that trade is not a race to where wages and conditions are lowest.

Anti-free traders rarely celebrate on the winners. We hear a great deal about how certain coffee farmers are unable to compete, but we are never told to celebrate the success stories in Brazil (where farmers have mechanized) or in Vietnam where producers are very efficient. Both countries are catching up with the West. Nor do we hear much celebration of countries like Hong Kong or South Korea or the other Asian Tiger economies.

The fact is that free trade – through an invisible hand – encourages production towards the countries that are best at producing. I am not aware of any mobile phones being manufactured in the USA, because other countries are better at that. On the other hand, the intellectual design of the microprocessor in three-quarters of the world’s mobile phones comes from a company based in Cambridge, England. 

Traditional electronics manufacturers in the USA have been decimated – and yet, we are a richer country that at any point in our past, and there are more jobs in the USA than ever before. 

It is a mistake for governments to assume that trying to keep everyone in traditional jobs is good for a country. While the Anti-Free Trade Movement likes the idea of a static world where everyone stays producing the same things, those countries that do well are those that are continually changing and adapting to market signals. This is what increasingly China is doing and that is why it is growing.

So there you have it. Again, stark in its reality, and cold in its application (Professor Archer taught me that line in Econ 334 20 year ago and I still use it today!)

Free trade makes America stronger and builds for better jobs and more of them. Free trade keeps quality up and prices low for consumers and their families. Free trade creates wealth in smaller countries and creates for a more efficient use of our resources. (there – I threw a bone at the greenies!)

It should be “They saved our Jerbbbbbs!” 






Tuesday, September 6, 2011

President Zero and the Magic Unicorn



Jobs created in August? Zero. Only time in post World War II America that has happened. Black teenage unemployment is at 50%, real salaries and wages decreasing. Consumer confidence decreasing. Business confidence less than zero. Deficit reduction?  Zero. Less than 2 in 10 Americans think America is on the right track. 19% in fact. 62% of Americans describe the chance of an improving economy as "bleak".

Number of magic unicorns in my backyard? Same as the Obama job growth figures. Zero

Maxine Walters says tea party supporters should "go to hell". Biden calls them "barbarians at the gate" and "terrorists". Jeanine Garafolo called any tea party supporter "obviously racist". Hoffa calls them "sons of bitches" that should be "taken out".  Seems like the sermons on civility by Obama were just simple rhetoric. Like a lot of the leftist policies, just more teleprompter driven, hot air.

Democrats are banned from using the word "stimulus" and have been instructed by Pelosi to refer to further stimulus packages as "infrastructure improvements". The phrase "stimulus package" has now been relegated into the same national joke-pile as "shovel ready projects".

What is the other "zero" Obama and the left should be thinking about? Their chances for a second term.

At least they have the logo ready.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Obama is going to pay my rent and I won't have to pay for gas anymore!


This gem is from the fine folks over at ProjectVote.org - the same group that was contracted by Acorn to register voters in many states including Nevada. While that didn't work out so good for the "non-partisan" folks over at ProjectVote (http://www.projectvote.org/litigation/671.html).

Their survey oversampled minorities (because of their growth in voter turnout?) then say the majority of respondents disagree with the Tea Party mantra of self reliance, small government and lower taxes? Huh?

From this they concluded that the majority of Americans are in favor of the government giving jobs to all - even if there is no need for the work! Sounds like organized wellfare. I'm sure being paid NOT to work is familiar to unionites - but to the rest of us, it just plain don't compute.

Since this survey was taken pre the 2010 mid term elections, they also made some inferences about voter turnout and voter support. It would seem the reign of error continues with the drubbing the left took in the mid-terms.

So if you want to read the survey - head on down to Acorn, I mean Projectvote.org - it's a laugh riot.